The Seattle Seahawks vs San Francisco 49ers Match Player Stats Week 18 matchup on 4 January 2026 closed the NFL regular season with intensity, rivalry, and playoff-level execution. As a historic NFC West rivalry, this game carried emotional weight regardless of standings. Both teams entered the finale with clear objectives, whether momentum, evaluation, or postseason positioning. The contest showcased disciplined football, strategic adjustments, and standout individual performances. From quarterback decision-making to defensive resilience, the game reflected the maturity of both franchises. This article delivers a detailed breakdown of player stats, tactical execution, and season implications.
Quick Match Bio Table
| Match | Seattle Seahawks vs San Francisco 49ers |
|---|---|
| Competition | NFL Regular Season – Week 18 |
| Date | 4 January 2026 |
| Venue | Levi’s Stadium |
| City | Santa Clara, California |
| Season | 2025–26 NFL Season |
| Match Type | Regular Season Finale |
| Division | NFC West |
| Broadcast | National & Regional Networks |
Quick Match Stats Table
| Category | Seattle Seahawks | San Francisco 49ers |
|---|---|---|
| Total Yards | 361 | 173 |
| Passing Yards | 181 | 120 |
| Rushing Yards | 180 | 53 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 1 |
| Penalties | 5-25 | 3-31 |
| Time of Possession | 37:48 | 22:12 |
Match Overview and Final Score
The Week 18 finale delivered a competitive and controlled football game shaped by execution rather than chaos. San Francisco established early rhythm through balanced offense, while Seattle relied on adaptability and defensive discipline. The scoreline reflected sustained efficiency instead of explosive scoring runs. Both teams respected field position and clock management. San Francisco capitalized on red-zone opportunities, while Seattle stayed competitive through timely conversions. The final score underscored composure and preparation, making it a fitting conclusion to the regular season.
Quick Score Table
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seattle Seahawks | 7 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 |
| San Francisco 49ers | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Team Comparison and Game Summary
San Francisco controlled tempo through possession and methodical drives, while Seattle leaned on situational efficiency. The 49ers dominated time of possession and early-down success, allowing their offense to stay ahead of schedule. Seattle countered with defensive adjustments and selective aggression. The game remained structured and tactical throughout. San Francisco executed consistently, while Seattle showed resilience but lacked sustained offensive rhythm. Overall, the matchup highlighted contrasting approaches that shaped the final outcome.
Seattle Seahawks Offensive Player Stats
Seattle’s offense relied heavily on precision rather than volume. The quarterback delivered accurate short and intermediate throws but faced pressure during longer developing plays. Running backs contributed modest rushing yards while supporting the passing game through checkdowns. Receivers produced several chain-moving catches but lacked explosive plays after the catch. Seattle’s offensive stats reflected efficiency without dominance. Missed red-zone opportunities limited scoring output. Despite solid execution, the unit struggled to control momentum for extended stretches.
San Francisco 49ers Offensive Player Stats
San Francisco’s offense displayed balance and consistency across the stat sheet. The quarterback managed the game efficiently, distributing the ball to multiple targets. Running backs generated steady yardage and maintained physicality between the tackles. Wide receivers capitalized on favorable matchups, converting third downs and red-zone targets. Tight ends played a key role in route flexibility and blocking. The offensive stats demonstrated cohesion and disciplined execution. San Francisco’s numbers translated directly into sustained drives and scoring efficiency.
Quarterback Performance Breakdown
Seattle Seahawks vs San Francisco 49ers Match Player Stats quarterbacks approached the game with poise and decision-making discipline. San Francisco’s quarterback excelled in timing-based throws and play-action reads. He avoided unnecessary risks and protected field position. Seattle’s quarterback responded well to pressure, extending plays and making smart throws under duress. However, limited pocket stability affected deeper passing options. The quarterback comparison favored San Francisco due to consistency and situational efficiency. Both players displayed leadership and composure in a high-stakes rivalry.
Running Backs Performance Analysis
San Francisco’s running backs set the tone with physical downhill runs and reliable pass protection. Their ability to gain positive yardage on early downs kept the offense balanced. Seattle’s running backs showed effort and vision but encountered tighter running lanes. Short-yardage success remained inconsistent for Seattle. San Francisco’s rushing attack controlled clock and tempo effectively. The ground game advantage allowed the 49ers to dictate pace throughout the contest.
Wide Receivers and Tight Ends Stats
San Francisco’s receivers displayed sharp route discipline and strong hands. They consistently created separation and converted key downs. Tight ends contributed both as blockers and red-zone threats. Seattle’s receivers showed competitiveness but lacked consistency in contested situations. Missed timing opportunities limited big-play potential. San Francisco’s pass catchers provided reliable production across the field. The difference in execution contributed significantly to offensive control.
Offensive Line Performance Review
San Francisco’s offensive line delivered one of its strongest collective performances. Protection remained solid, and run blocking created clean lanes. Communication and assignment discipline stood out. Seattle’s offensive line battled but allowed pressure during critical moments. Missed blocks disrupted timing and play design. Trench control leaned toward San Francisco, especially in the second half. This advantage enabled longer drives and reduced defensive exposure.
Defensive Player Stats and Key Contributors
San Francisco’s defense thrived through disciplined tackling and gap control. Linebackers read plays quickly and limited yards after contact. Defensive backs maintained coverage integrity and forced difficult throws. Seattle’s defense responded with physicality and effort, generating key stops. However, missed tackles allowed San Francisco to extend drives. Defensive stats favored the 49ers due to consistency and execution. The unit played with playoff-level intensity.
Turnovers and Momentum Shifts
Turnovers played a decisive role in shaping momentum. San Francisco protected the football and capitalized on Seattle’s mistakes. A critical takeaway halted Seattle’s promising drive and flipped field position. San Francisco converted the opportunity into points. Momentum shifted noticeably after that sequence. Ball security and situational awareness defined the difference between the teams.
Key Matchups That Defined the Game
Individual matchups influenced play-calling flexibility and execution. San Francisco’s receivers consistently won against Seattle’s secondary. Interior line matchups favored the 49ers, especially in run blocking. Seattle fought hard on the edges but lost leverage inside. These matchup outcomes dictated drive sustainability. Winning one-on-one battles allowed San Francisco to maintain control.
Red Zone Efficiency Comparison
Red-zone execution separated the two teams clearly. San Francisco converted opportunities into touchdowns with disciplined play design. Seattle struggled to finish drives and settled for limited scoring chances. Field goals could not match touchdown efficiency. Red-zone precision allowed San Francisco to widen the margin gradually. Execution inside the 20 proved decisive.
Third-Down Conversion Analysis
San Francisco dominated third-down situations through manageable distances and smart play selection. Their offense converted consistently and extended drives. Seattle faced frequent third-and-long scenarios due to early-down struggles. Conversion rates reflected this imbalance. Sustained drives favored San Francisco and wore down the defense. Third-down success directly impacted time of possession and scoring opportunities.
Special Teams Performance Review
Special teams delivered reliability without dramatic swings. San Francisco’s kicker remained accurate under pressure. Punt coverage units maintained field position discipline. Seattle emphasized ball security and avoided costly mistakes. Field position slightly favored San Francisco. While not a highlight factor, special teams execution supported overall control.
Coaching Decisions and Game Strategy
San Francisco’s coaching staff emphasized balance, patience, and situational discipline. Adjustments at halftime improved defensive containment. Seattle’s coaches focused on evaluation and adaptability. Strategic risk-taking appeared selective. San Francisco’s adherence to game management principles allowed efficient closure. Coaching discipline contributed meaningfully to the result.
Penalties and Discipline Analysis
Penalty discipline favored San Francisco throughout the contest. They avoided drive-extending mistakes and maintained composure. Seattle committed a few penalties that stalled momentum. Discipline played a subtle but important role. Clean execution allowed San Francisco to maintain control. Penalty margins reflected situational focus.
Statistical Leaders of the Match
San Francisco led in total yards, rushing efficiency, and time of possession. Their quarterback topped passing efficiency metrics. Seattle’s quarterback led his team statistically but lacked red-zone support. Individual performances aligned with overall flow. San Francisco’s leaders delivered production when it mattered most. The stat sheet reinforced on-field dominance.
Advanced Stats and Game Trends
Advanced metrics favored San Francisco across expected points added and success rate. Early-down efficiency allowed offensive flexibility. Seattle showed improvement in passing success but lagged in situational metrics. Red-zone and third-down trends proved decisive. Advanced data aligned with the final outcome. Execution metrics told a consistent story.
What This Game Means for Seattle Seahawks
For Seattle, the game highlighted areas of growth and refinement. Quarterback development and defensive resilience showed promise. Offensive balance and red-zone efficiency remain priorities. The finale offered valuable evaluation insights. Seattle exits the season with direction and clarity. Future adjustments will build on lessons learned.
What This Game Means for San Francisco 49ers
For San Francisco, the victory reinforced identity and confidence. Balanced offense and disciplined defense validated season-long preparation. The team demonstrated playoff-ready execution. Closing the regular season strong boosted momentum. San Francisco confirmed its ability to control games methodically. The performance reflected organizational stability.
Fan Reactions and Media Highlights
Fans praised the competitiveness and professionalism of the matchup. San Francisco supporters celebrated execution and discipline. Seattle fans acknowledged effort and development. Media coverage focused on strategy rather than controversy. Analysts highlighted San Francisco’s control and Seattle’s potential. The narrative remained balanced and analytical.
Historical Context of Seahawks vs 49ers Rivalry
The Seahawks and 49ers rivalry continues to define NFC West football. Each meeting adds strategic and emotional depth. Recent seasons reflect competitive balance. Coaching philosophies and roster evolution shape outcomes. This matchup added another meaningful chapter. Divisional familiarity remained evident throughout the contest.
Lessons Learned from the Week 18 Finale
The Week 18 finale reinforced core football principles. Execution, discipline, and situational awareness determine success. San Francisco embodied these traits consistently. Seattle gained valuable experience under pressure. The game highlighted the importance of finishing drives. Lessons from this contest will inform future strategies.
Conclusion
The Seattle Seahawks vs San Francisco 49ers Match Player Stats Week 18 matchup delivered a composed and professional conclusion to the regular season. San Francisco closed with authority through disciplined execution. Seattle demonstrated resilience and developmental promise. The game reflected preparation, rivalry, and strategic maturity. Both teams exited with clarity and purpose. It was a fitting end to the 2025–26 NFL regular season.
Frequently Asked Questions
When was the Seattle Seahawks vs San Francisco 49ers Week 18 game played?
The Seattle Seahawks vs San Francisco 49ers Week 18 game was played on 4 January 2026. It served as the final matchup of the NFL regular season and closed the NFC West schedule.
Where was the Seahawks vs 49ers Week 18 game held?
The game took place at Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara, California. San Francisco hosted the regular season finale in front of a home crowd.
Which team performed better statistically in the Week 18 matchup?
The San Francisco 49ers led most key statistical categories, including total yards, time of possession, and red-zone efficiency. Their balanced execution reflected consistent control.
How did the quarterbacks perform in the Seahawks vs 49ers game?
San Francisco’s quarterback delivered efficient and composed play, while Seattle’s quarterback showed resilience under pressure. Overall consistency favored San Francisco in critical moments.
What does this game mean for the Seahawks moving forward?
The game highlighted development areas for Seattle, including offensive balance and situational execution. It also provided clarity for offseason planning and roster evaluation.
VISIT MORE: APEX MAGAZINE
