Seahawks vs Arizona Cardinals Match Player Stats: Full Game Breakdown

The Seahawks vs Arizona Cardinals Match Player Stats in a tightly contested matchup that highlighted execution, discipline, and situational football. Seattle secured a 23–20 victory after controlling key moments across all four quarters. While the Cardinals showed resilience, especially in the second half, Seattle’s balance on offense and steadiness on defense proved decisive. The final score reflected a game where momentum shifted several times but ultimately favored the more efficient side.

Quick Match Stats Table

Category	Seattle Seahawks	Arizona Cardinals
Total Yards	384	253
Passing Yards	229	164
Rushing Yards	155	89
Penalties	6-74	7-46
Turnovers	1	2
Possession	32:24	27:36

Quick Score Table

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Final
Seattle Seahawks	7	7	3	6	23
Arizona Cardinals	3	0	3	14	20

First Quarter Analysis: Fast Start by Seattle

Seattle opened the game with confidence and tempo, establishing early control through structured offensive drives. The Seahawks capitalized on Arizona’s conservative defensive looks, scoring a quick touchdown to set the tone. Arizona responded with a field goal, but Seattle’s early aggression forced the Cardinals into a reactive posture. This quarter emphasized Seattle’s preparation and ability to exploit early mismatches.

Second Quarter Momentum Shift

The second quarter belonged largely to Seattle, as the Seahawks continued to pressure Arizona’s defense with short passes and disciplined runs. Another touchdown extended Seattle’s lead, while Arizona struggled to sustain drives. Missed opportunities and stalled possessions limited the Cardinals’ scoring potential. By halftime, Seattle held a comfortable advantage that reflected superior execution rather than overwhelming dominance.

Third Quarter Comeback Effort by Arizona

Arizona returned from halftime with renewed energy and urgency. The Cardinals adjusted their offensive strategy, increasing tempo and using play-action to stretch Seattle’s defense. These changes resulted in two scoring drives that narrowed the gap significantly. Seattle, meanwhile, relied on ball control to weather the surge. The third quarter became the turning point that kept the game competitive until the final minutes.

Fourth Quarter Execution and Game Control

In the final quarter, Seattle demonstrated composure under pressure. Rather than forcing risky plays, the Seahawks leaned on smart clock management and field position. Arizona added a late field goal, but Seattle’s defense prevented a game-winning drive. The fourth quarter highlighted Seattle’s experience and ability to close out close games.

Seahawks Offensive Performance Breakdown

Seattle’s offense showed balance and adaptability throughout the game. The mix of passing and rushing kept Arizona guessing and prevented defensive overloads. Sustained drives helped control tempo and limit Arizona’s time of possession. Seattle’s offense did not rely on explosive plays alone but focused on efficiency and situational awareness.

Seahawks Passing Game Efficiency

The Seahawks recorded 229 passing yards, emphasizing accuracy and timing rather than deep shots. The quarterback distributed the ball effectively, spreading targets across multiple receivers. Short and intermediate routes proved especially effective, allowing Seattle to convert crucial third downs. This controlled passing approach minimized turnovers and maintained offensive rhythm.

Seahawks Rushing Attack Impact

Seattle’s rushing game produced 155 yards, providing essential balance and physicality. The run game consistently gained positive yardage, keeping the offense ahead of schedule. These rushing efforts wore down Arizona’s front line and played a major role in late-game clock control. The ability to run effectively under pressure reinforced Seattle’s strategic advantage.

Arizona Cardinals Offensive Struggles

Arizona’s offense struggled to find consistency throughout the game, finishing with just 253 total yards. Early drives lacked rhythm and direction, forcing the Cardinals into repeated third-and-long situations. These stalled possessions limited scoring chances and shifted pressure onto the defense. Although the second half showed signs of improvement, the damage from early stagnation proved difficult to overcome. Offensive inconsistency ultimately prevented Arizona from sustaining momentum and controlling the flow of the game.

Cardinals Passing Game Overview

The Cardinals recorded 164 passing yards, but production fluctuated sharply between quarters. Early misfires disrupted timing and prevented the offense from building confidence. Defensive pressure from Seattle further restricted passing lanes and forced hurried decisions. While execution improved after halftime, missed connections earlier in the game limited overall effectiveness. The passing attack showed potential but lacked the steady efficiency required to challenge Seattle across all four quarters.

Cardinals Rushing Performance Analysis

Arizona’s rushing output of 89 yards reflected difficulty establishing ground control. Seattle’s defensive front consistently won battles at the line of scrimmage, limiting early gains. Without a dependable rushing presence, Arizona became increasingly predictable on offense. This imbalance allowed Seattle to focus defensive resources on pass coverage. The absence of a sustained running threat significantly reduced offensive flexibility and play-calling effectiveness.

Defensive Performance: Seattle Seahawks

Seattle’s defense delivered a composed and disciplined performance from start to finish. They limited explosive plays and forced Arizona to earn yards through extended drives. Strong third-down defense and reliable tackling prevented Arizona from capitalizing on brief momentum swings. Late-game execution remained sharp, with defenders closing gaps and maintaining coverage integrity. This disciplined approach played a decisive role in securing the victory.

Defensive Performance: Arizona Cardinals

Arizona’s defense faced heavy pressure due to prolonged time on the field. While they produced several stops and moments of resistance, sustained Seattle drives gradually wore them down. Missed tackles and penalties extended possessions and increased fatigue. Despite effort and competitiveness, the defense struggled to fully reset after halftime. Offensive inefficiency ultimately magnified defensive challenges.

Turnovers and Penalty Impact

Turnovers and penalties proved critical in shaping the game’s outcome. Seattle maintained strong ball security, committing only one turnover. Arizona, however, recorded two turnovers that disrupted momentum and field position. Penalty discipline also favored Seattle, as Arizona’s infractions extended drives and stalled defensive progress. These errors shifted key moments and contributed directly to Seattle’s controlled advantage.

Time of Possession and Game Flow

Seattle’s control of the clock played a central role in shaping the rhythm of the game. By holding possession for over 32 minutes, the Seahawks dictated tempo and limited Arizona’s ability to build sustained momentum. Long, methodical drives allowed Seattle to rest its defense while forcing the Cardinals to defend extended series. Arizona’s shorter time of possession highlighted ongoing struggles to convert third downs and sustain drives, especially in the first half. This imbalance in ball control steadily wore down Arizona’s defense and proved decisive in protecting Seattle’s late-game lead.

Key Player Contributions for Seattle

Seattle’s victory reflected strong contributions across multiple positions rather than reliance on a single star. The quarterback delivered composed and efficient play, making smart decisions that minimized risk and kept drives alive. Receivers executed routes with precision and consistency, providing reliable targets in crucial situations. The rushing unit added physicality and balance, helping Seattle maintain offensive rhythm and control the clock. On defense, veteran leaders stepped up during critical fourth-quarter moments, shutting down Arizona’s late push and reinforcing Seattle’s overall team cohesion.

Key Player Contributions for Arizona

Arizona’s key players demonstrated determination and resilience, particularly during the third-quarter surge that brought the Cardinals back into contention. Offensive leaders sparked momentum through improved execution and sharper play-calling, briefly shifting pressure onto Seattle. Defensive standouts also made timely stops that prevented the game from slipping away early. However, these individual efforts could not fully overcome early inefficiencies and missed opportunities. The lack of consistent production across all quarters ultimately limited Arizona’s ability to complete the comeback.

Coaching Decisions and Tactical Adjustments

Coaching strategy strongly influenced the outcome of the matchup. Seattle’s coaching staff focused on balance, patience, and situational awareness, adjusting tempo to protect their lead rather than forcing aggressive plays. Their game management emphasized clock control, disciplined execution, and defensive stability late in the contest. Arizona’s coaching staff made effective halftime adjustments that improved offensive flow and competitiveness in the second half. However, the early strategic setbacks proved difficult to undo, giving Seattle a tactical edge across all phases of the game.

Statistical Comparison and Match Summary

From a statistical standpoint, Seattle held clear advantages in total yards, rushing production, and time of possession. These numbers reflect control rather than explosive dominance. Seattle sustained drives, limited mistakes, and steadily wore down Arizona’s defense. Although the Cardinals improved significantly after halftime, the overall trend remained unchanged. Seattle’s efficiency across key metrics translated directly into game management and scoreboard stability. The statistics confirm that this was a victory built on discipline and execution rather than high-risk plays.

What This Win Means for the Seahawks

This win reinforces Seattle’s identity as a composed and well-balanced team. Success in a closely contested divisional game boosts confidence and strengthens locker-room belief. The ability to manage the clock and close out the fourth quarter highlights maturity and preparation. Seattle can take encouragement from the consistency shown across offense, defense, and coaching decisions. Wins like this often serve as momentum builders during the season. They also establish trust in systems that prioritize patience and smart football.

What This Loss Means for the Cardinals

For Arizona, the loss highlights the cost of slow starts and early inefficiencies. The second-half response showed resilience and competitive spirit, but recovery mode placed unnecessary pressure on the team. Inconsistent execution during the opening quarters created a gap that proved difficult to close. Despite positive individual performances, the Cardinals struggled to maintain balance throughout the game. This matchup offers valuable lessons in preparation, adaptability, and sustained focus. Addressing these areas will be critical for future success.

Conclusion

The Seahawks vs Arizona Cardinals matchup delivered a competitive and tactically driven contest. Seattle’s control of tempo, balanced offense, and late-game composure defined the outcome. Arizona demonstrated determination and improvement but lacked consistency from start to finish. Ultimately, preparation, discipline, and situational awareness separated the two teams. This game serves as a strong example of how efficient execution and strategic patience decide close NFL battles.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the Seahawks vs Arizona Cardinals game?

The Seattle Seahawks won the match with a final score of 23–20.

Which team had more total yards?

Seattle led with 384 total yards, while Arizona recorded 253.

How did time of possession affect the game?

Seattle controlled the ball for over 32 minutes, limiting Arizona’s offensive opportunities.

What was the turning point of the match?

Arizona’s third-quarter comeback narrowed the gap, but Seattle’s fourth-quarter control sealed the win.

Did turnovers influence the final result?

Yes, Arizona committed more turnovers, which shifted momentum toward Seattle.

VISIT MORE: APEX MAGAZINE