Boston Celtics vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats and Full Game Analysis 3 Feb 2026

The Boston Celtics vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats was a high‑scoring NBA regular‑season battle that ended with the Celtics on top, 110–100, at the American Airlines Center in Dallas. Boston displayed balanced offense and clutch scoring while Dallas put up a strong fight, led by Cooper Flagg’s 36 points. The matchup provided exciting basketball for fans and meaningful implications for both teams’ positioning in the Eastern and Western Conferences.

This game paired Boston’s deep offensive rotation against Dallas’s youthful firepower. Jaylen Brown led the Celtics with a near triple‑double performance, while Flagg kept the Mavericks competitive with his historic scoring run. Despite equal effort on both sides, Boston’s efficiency in key moments and disciplined execution under pressure eventually tipped the scales in their favor.

Quick Score Summary Table

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Final
Boston Celtics	32	20	34	24	110
Dallas Mavericks	29	15	23	33	100

Quick Match Stats Overview

Category	Boston Celtics	Dallas Mavericks
Field Goal %	49.0%	41.6%
3‑Point %	33.3%	28.1%
Free Throw %	60.0%	77.3%
Total Rebounds	53	56
Assists	27	21
Turnovers	9	9
Steals	7	4
Blocks	4	4

Match Overview and Final Score

Boston’s 110–100 win showed resilience and depth from start to finish. After a tightly contested first quarter, where both teams exchanged scoring runs, the Celtics gradually turned defensive stops into transition offense. Their ability to convert contested shots and protect the paint enabled them to build a manageable lead by halftime.

Dallas, despite a strong individual performance from Flagg, struggled to sustain offensive consistency across all four quarters. Though they poured in 33 points in the final frame and showed moments of brilliance, Dallas couldn’t fully erase Boston’s advantage built earlier in the matchup. Ultimately, situational execution and bench contributions helped Boston close with authority.

First Quarter Analysis: Opening Momentum

The Celtics struck first with urgency and sharp ball movement, opening the game on a 32‑18 first quarter that showcased their offensive balance. Jaylen Brown hit mid‑range jumpers and attacked close to the rim, forcing mismatches that Dallas struggled to contain. Boston’s defensive pressure also disrupted early Maverick sets, leading to easier transition buckets.

Dallas countered with an aggressive approach, using quick screens and ball rotation to penetrate Boston’s defense. While Flagg scored at will early, Dallas’s inconsistency in spacing and occasional missed defensive rotations allowed Boston to extend its lead late in the period. The first quarter set the competitive tone for the contest.

Second Quarter Breakdown: Adjustments and Scoring Drives

In the second quarter, Dallas looked to tighten its defense and move the ball more efficiently through picks and give‑and‑go plays. Flagg continued to create off the dribble, and Mavericks big men tried to crash the boards for second‑chance points. However, turnovers and contested Celtics defensive schemes kept Dallas from gaining sustained scoring stretches.

Boston expanded its lead through strategic spacing and off‑ball movement. Payton Pritchard provided spark off the bench with confident drives and sharp shooting. His scoring prowess helped Boston maintain offensive balance and slowed Dallas’s defensive adjustments. The Celtics entered halftime with a comfortable edge.

Third Quarter Turning Point: Shifts in Momentum

The third quarter proved decisive as Boston surged with a 34‑23 performance that widened the point differential. This phase saw multiple long Boston scoring runs, punctuated by a series of threes and contested drives that wore down Dallas’s defense. Jaylen Brown continued to dominate the scoreboard, forcing rotations that opened up shots for others.

Dallas responded with gritty hustle plays, including putbacks and second‑effort drives, yet those efforts only slowed the Celtics’ momentum rather than reversing it. Boston’s disciplined structure and efficiency in shot selection allowed them to keep control, signaling a pivotal shift in the contest’s competitive rhythm.

Fourth Quarter Drama: Closing Performances

Dallas began the fourth quarter with renewed energy, cutting into Boston’s lead through timely catch‑and‑shoot opportunities and quicker ball circulation. Flagg’s creativity and finishing ability energized the Mavericks’ pursuit. Had this been earlier in the season, momentum might have fully swung Dallas’s way.

However, Boston stood firm. The Celtics maintained their offensive balance, combining interior scoring and baseline execution to hold Dallas at bay. The fourth‑quarter play reflected Boston’s experience and confidence; even as Dallas mounted pressure, Boston responded with methodical, well‑executed plays that carried them through to the final buzzer.

Boston Celtics Offensive Player Stats

Offensively, Boston’s attack was led by Jaylen Brown, who finished with 33 points and 11 rebounds in a dominant all‑around performance. His ability to score at multiple levels including mid‑range jumpers and drives created space for teammates and kept Dallas guessing defensively.

Alongside Brown, Payton Pritchard added a crucial scoring punch off the bench with 26 points, showing confidence and efficiency in catch‑and‑shoot opportunities. Derrick White and Luka Garza also chipped in with scoring bursts that sustained the Celtics’ offensive balance across all four quarters.

Boston Celtics Defensive Highlights

Boston’s defense contributed significantly to their success despite allowing Dallas to score 100 points. The Celtics applied steady ball pressure, forcing contested shots and limiting easy looks in transition. Their rotations remained tight, particularly in the third quarter when Dallas tried to counter Boston’s lead.

Key defensive stops came at critical junctures, especially when Dallas closed within striking distance. Boston defenders maintained gap discipline, contested 3‑point attempts, and secured rebounds to limit Mavericks second‑chance opportunities. This defensive effort slowed Dallas’s momentum and allowed Boston to control game tempo.

Dallas Mavericks Offensive Player Stats

Despite the loss, the Mavericks’ offense had standout moments. Rookie Cooper Flagg continued his breakout season with 36 points, 9 rebounds, and 6 assists, marking one of his best performances of the year. His scoring variety from drives to pull‑ups challenged Boston’s defense consistently.

Daniel Gafford also contributed a strong presence inside with 10 points and 12 rebounds, showing toughness on both ends. Caleb Martin chipped in 13 points, providing additional scoring depth. Though productive, the Mavericks lacked Boston’s consistency across all units, which made it difficult for them to sustain late scoring runs.

Dallas Mavericks Defensive Standouts

Dallas’s defense showcased effort despite allowing 110 points. Gafford anchored the paint, altering shots and securing 12 rebounds, while rookie Flagg contributed defensively with multiple steals and on-ball pressure. Their defensive rotation was decent in transition, forcing Boston to take contested shots on a few possessions.

However, Boston exploited mismatches and weak rotations, particularly in the third quarter. Celtics cutters and perimeter shooters consistently found open lanes, highlighting that Dallas’s defense, while active, sometimes struggled to maintain structure under sustained pressure. This gap in rotations contributed directly to Boston’s decisive scoring run in the pivotal third quarter.

Key Player Comparisons: Points, Assists, and Efficiency

Jaylen Brown outshined all competitors with 33 points and 11 rebounds, demonstrating both scoring efficiency and consistent rebounding. Cooper Flagg led Dallas in points (36) but had fewer assists and less efficiency on contested shots, which limited Mavericks’ secondary scoring.

Boston’s bench players collectively contributed 41 points, showing depth and efficient scoring distribution. Meanwhile, Dallas relied heavily on Flagg and the starting five. The disparity in bench productivity gave Boston a key advantage in terms of sustained energy and overall team efficiency throughout the 48 minutes.

Rebounding Leaders: Boards and Second-Chance Opportunities

Boston totaled 53 rebounds, with Brown, Gafford, and White actively crashing the boards. Second-chance points were critical in extending their lead, particularly in the first and third quarters where offensive rebounds led to easy put-backs and reset possessions.

Dallas slightly out-rebounded Boston with 56 boards, mainly due to Gafford’s presence and Martin’s hustle. Despite the rebound advantage, Boston maximized possession efficiency by converting their opportunities into higher percentage points, showing that board control alone does not always determine outcomes when execution varies.

Special Teams / Bench Contributions and Impact

Boston’s bench played a pivotal role, with Pritchard scoring 26 points and White contributing 14, creating multiple momentum-swinging plays. The bench sustained defensive effort and spacing on offense, reducing the fatigue of starters and keeping Dallas from regaining rhythm.

Dallas bench contributions were limited in impact, with most points concentrated among Flagg, Gafford, and Martin. While these players performed efficiently in short spurts, the lack of extended bench support meant Dallas starters faced heavier minutes, leading to slower rotations and defensive lapses during Boston scoring runs.

Turnovers and Fouls: Critical Mistakes

Turnovers were pivotal in determining the flow of the game. Both Boston and Dallas committed nine turnovers, but the Celtics capitalized far more effectively. Every miscue by the Mavericks became an opportunity for transition scoring, with Boston turning several turnovers into fast-break points. The Celtics’ careful ball handling minimized unforced errors, allowing them to maintain possession and dictate the pace of play. Their ability to convert mistakes into scoring opportunities gave them a psychological edge that persisted throughout the game.

Fouls also played a critical role in game management. Boston committed 20 fouls, but strategically used them to force Dallas into high-pressure situations in the paint, disrupting their rhythm and limiting easy shots. Dallas, with only 11 fouls, exhibited cleaner defensive spacing but lacked aggressive disruption that could have slowed Boston’s offensive momentum. The combination of disciplined foul management and smart handling of turnovers enabled Boston to control the game’s tempo, secure points, and maintain composure in high-pressure situations.

Strategies and Tactical Decisions

Celtics head coach Joe Mazzulla employed a strategy focused on spacing, rotation discipline, and shared offensive responsibility. His game plan emphasized exploiting Dallas’s weak defensive matchups, particularly during the third quarter when the Celtics ran high-efficiency plays to create open shots. Mazzulla’s proactive adjustments, including strategic substitutions and rotations, ensured that key Celtics scorers remained fresh and effective. His focus on combining transition and half-court execution allowed Boston to maximize scoring opportunities while maintaining defensive stability.

On the other side, Jason Kidd coached Dallas with an emphasis on Cooper Flagg’s offensive creativity and fast-break opportunities. The Mavericks relied heavily on Flagg to generate scoring runs, while attempting double-team rotations and defensive adjustments. However, these tactics were implemented too late to significantly reverse momentum, and Boston’s balanced approach neutralized Dallas’s efforts. Kidd’s strategies highlighted the challenge of adapting quickly in-game against a disciplined opponent, showcasing the critical importance of timing and execution in tactical decisions.

What This Game Means for the Season Standings

Boston’s victory strengthened their positioning in the Eastern Conference playoffs, reflecting both depth and star leadership. The team’s efficient offense, combined with disciplined defensive rotations, underscores their ability to perform under pressure. Wins like this build confidence, reinforce the Celtics’ game plan, and provide a template for maintaining high performance against other top-tier opponents throughout the remainder of the 2025–26 season.

For Dallas, the result highlighted areas requiring improvement to remain competitive in the Western Conference. While individual talent shone, the Mavericks’ bench contributions and defensive rotations must improve for sustained success. The game served as a reality check on consistency, emphasizing that even explosive scoring by a single player, like Cooper Flagg, must be supported by team-wide efficiency and execution to translate into wins.

Conclusion

The Boston Celtics’ 110–100 victory over the Dallas Mavericks demonstrated the significance of team cohesion, bench contributions, and disciplined execution. Boston’s balanced scoring, effective rotations, and defensive efficiency allowed them to maintain control throughout the game. Star players like Jaylen Brown delivered key performances, while bench players sustained momentum and mitigated Dallas’s offensive threats.

This matchup serves as a case study in balancing individual brilliance with team efficiency. Both teams learned critical lessons: Boston reinforced its winning formula of structured offense and defense, while Dallas identified areas for growth in bench depth and rotational consistency. Moving forward, these insights will shape strategies for the remainder of the 2025–26 NBA season, as both teams pursue playoff objectives.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score of the Celtics vs Mavericks game on 3 Feb 2026?

The Boston Celtics defeated the Dallas Mavericks 110–100.

Who was the top scorer for Boston?

Jaylen Brown led Boston with 33 points and 11 rebounds.

Who was the top scorer for Dallas?

Cooper Flagg scored 36 points and grabbed 9 rebounds for Dallas.

How did Boston’s bench contribute?

Boston’s bench contributed 41 points, with Payton Pritchard scoring 26 and Derrick White adding 14.

What were the key statistics determining the game outcome?

Boston’s higher shooting efficiency, superior assist distribution, and defensive discipline were critical. Turnovers and rebounding were nearly even.

VISIT MORE: APEX MAGAZINE