The Philadelphia Eagles vs Kansas City Chiefs Match Player Stats have become among the most anticipated games in the NFL in recent seasons, featuring two franchises with strong offensive pedigrees and elite talent on both sides of the ball. These contests often showcase star quarterbacks, dynamic receivers, and strategic coaching adjustments that define playoff‑level football. Whether it’s a regular‑season battle or a championship rematch, Eagles‑Chiefs games deliver high‑impact plays and critical statistics that fans and analysts study closely.
The most recent example a 20–17 Eagles victory on September 14, 2025 highlighted how closely matched these teams remain at the top of the league. Despite limited yardage on both sides, situational execution, clutch playmaking, and defensive resilience ultimately decided the outcome. This article breaks down every major statistical area from that game and other recent matchups, offering a complete performance analysis for both teams.
- Quick Score Table
- Quick Match Stats Table
- Quarter-by-Quarter Score Analysis
- Philadelphia Eagles Offensive Player Stats Breakdown
- Kansas City Chiefs Offensive Player Stats Breakdown
- Quarterback Performance Comparison
- Running Game Leaders and Rushing Stats
- Receiving Leaders and Key Passing Targets
- Defensive Standouts and Impact Plays
- Turnovers, Penalties, and Game‑Changing Moments
- Red Zone Efficiency and Third‑Down Conversions
- Time of Possession and Game Control Metrics
- Special Teams Performance Highlights
- Key Player Matchups That Defined the Game
- Coaching Strategy and Tactical Adjustments
- Top Individual Performances of the Match
- Statistical Comparison: Eagles vs Chiefs Team Metrics
- What This Game Means for Both Teams Moving Forward
- Conclusion
- Frequently Asked Questions
Quick Score Table
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eagles | 7 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 20 |
| Chiefs | 0 | 10 | 0 | 7 | 17 |
This score table underscores how the Eagles controlled early momentum, taking a lead in the first quarter and never relinquishing it. Philadelphia’s scoring consistency in each quarter contrasted with Kansas City’s more sporadic offensive bursts.
By the final whistle, the Eagles had established a slight but decisive edge by scoring in all four periods, while the Chiefs primarily rallied in the second and fourth quarters. This scoring progression reflects the ebb and flow of strategic adjustments made by both coaching staffs throughout the game.
Quick Match Stats Table
| Category | Eagles | Chiefs |
|---|---|---|
| Total Yards | 216 | 294 |
| Passing Yards | 94 | 173 |
| Rushing Yards | 122 | 121 |
| Time of Possession | 32:34 | 27:26 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 1 |
| First Downs | 17 | 16 |
| Red Zone Efficiency | 2‑2 | 1‑2 |
Quarter-by-Quarter Score Analysis
Philadelphia started strong, scoring a touchdown in the first quarter to seize early momentum. This opening score energized the home crowd and put immediate pressure on the Chiefs’ offense to respond. Kansas City’s early offensive possessions struggled to find rhythm, leading to punts rather than sustained drives.
In the second quarter, both teams traded points the Chiefs putting together an efficient drive that resulted in a field goal and a touchdown, while the Eagles responded with a long field goal of their own. The third quarter saw both sides defend stoutly, resulting in only three more points for Philadelphia. In the final quarter, the Eagles capitalized on a key drive to put the game out of reach, while Kansas City’s last‑ditch efforts fell short.
Philadelphia Eagles Offensive Player Stats Breakdown
The Eagles’ offense leaned heavily on a balanced rushing attack and short‑to‑intermediate passing scheme. Saquon Barkley led the ground game with 88 rushing yards and a touchdown, demonstrating physicality and vision between the tackles. His performance controlled late‑game clock and helped keep the Chiefs’ defense honest.
Quarterback Jalen Hurts finished with 101 passing yards and a rushing touchdown, a signature example of his dual‑threat ability. Despite modest passing totals, Hurts’ leadership and efficiency in managing key possession situations were pivotal. Philadelphia’s receivers also contributed, with DeVonta Smith among the primary targets compiling consistent yardage on critical downs.
Kansas City Chiefs Offensive Player Stats Breakdown
Patrick Mahomes led the Chiefs with 187 passing yards, 1 touchdown, and 1 interception. While his yardage total was higher than Hurts’, Mahomes faced pressure when attempting deeper play designs, partly due to a stout Eagles secondary that contested throws effectively.
On the ground, Mahomes also contributed with 66 rushing yards and a rushing touchdown, showcasing his ability to make plays with his legs. However, the Chiefs’ running game lacked a consistent breakout performer, contributing to longer drives that stalled before reaching the end zone as frequently as the Eagles’ did.
Quarterback Performance Comparison
Jalen Hurts delivered a performance defined by discipline and situational awareness. Although his passing yardage was modest, his ability to extend plays with his legs and make key decisions under pressure kept drives alive when they mattered most. This balanced approach allowed the Eagles to effectively manage the clock and limit Kansas City’s opportunities to dominate possession.
In contrast, Patrick Mahomes displayed his typical creativity and arm talent, connecting on intermediate throws and pushing the offense downfield. However, the Chiefs’ limited red zone production and one turnover highlighted the challenges of converting yardage into efficient scoring opportunities. Mahomes’ efforts kept Kansas City in contention, but they ultimately fell just short.
Running Game Leaders and Rushing Stats
Saquon Barkley was the standout in Philadelphia’s backfield, totaling 88 rushing yards and a touchdown. His physicality allowed the Eagles to control tempo and maintain long drives. Barkley’s performance wasn’t just about yardage it influenced the game’s pace by forcing the Chiefs’ defense to stay disciplined in run support.
The Chiefs’ ground game was nearly as productive, with Patrick Mahomes rushing for 66 yards and a touchdown. While not a traditional running back, Mahomes’ mobility added another dimension to Kansas City’s attack. Still, the lack of a featured running back with impactful yardage limited their ability to sustain longer possession sequences.
Receiving Leaders and Key Passing Targets
DeVonta Smith led the Eagles’ receiving corps with consistent, reliable catches that kept key drives alive and maintained offensive momentum throughout the game. Despite Philadelphia’s passing game being limited in yardage, Smith’s ability to create separation and secure contested catches allowed quarterback Jalen Hurts to manage the game efficiently. His precise route running and sure hands were particularly vital on third‑down situations, enabling the Eagles to extend drives and control the clock, which ultimately influenced the close 20–17 victory.
On the Chiefs’ side, veteran tight end Travis Kelce remained the focal point of Kansas City’s aerial attack. Kelce finished with 61 receiving yards and a touchdown, making contested grabs over defenders in the mid-field and converting key third-down plays. His awareness of zone coverage and ability to exploit mismatches provided the Chiefs with a reliable chain-moving target. While the Chiefs were limited in scoring, Kelce’s contributions kept the offense competitive and offered Patrick Mahomes a dependable option in high-pressure moments.
Defensive Standouts and Impact Plays
Philadelphia’s defense executed a disciplined scheme that limited explosive pass plays and minimized yardage after catches. The defensive line consistently pressured Patrick Mahomes, forcing him into longer third-down situations and hurried throws. Linebackers and secondary players maintained gap integrity and aggressive pursuit angles, preventing Kansas City from generating sustained drives. Their defensive performance was critical in allowing the Eagles to control field position and pace, ultimately keeping the game within their strategic reach.
The Chiefs’ defense also had notable individual performances, particularly in containing Jalen Hurts’ passing options. They played tight coverage on intermediate routes and demonstrated strong awareness in open-field tackling, which disrupted several potential gains. However, Philadelphia’s commitment to the ground game and smart option reads allowed them to pick up yardage consistently on the ground, giving the Eagles a time-of-possession advantage. This dual defensive dynamic strong individual plays but inability to stop sustained drives shaped the flow of the match.
Turnovers, Penalties, and Game‑Changing Moments
Turnovers were a pivotal factor in the Eagles’ narrow win. Philadelphia committed no turnovers, which allowed them to maintain control of possession and field position. Conversely, Kansas City suffered a key interception from Patrick Mahomes, which shifted momentum and granted the Eagles a scoring opportunity in a critical stage of the game. This turnover disparity was instrumental in keeping the Chiefs from mounting a full comeback, illustrating how a single defensive play can influence the entire outcome.
Penalties were relatively balanced between the two sides, but even minor infractions impacted drive efficiency. Philadelphia and Kansas City both incurred penalties that stalled progress, particularly on third-down conversions, forcing longer yardage situations. In a close 20–17 game, each penalty carried heightened significance, affecting field position and scoring opportunities. These subtle, situational factors underscore how execution in seemingly minor moments can ultimately define results in NFL matchups.
Red Zone Efficiency and Third‑Down Conversions
Philadelphia excelled in red zone efficiency, converting both of their scoring opportunities into points, whether through touchdowns or field goals. Their play-calling in tight spaces combined short passes, inside runs, and misdirection plays that consistently kept the Kansas City defense guessing. By maximizing execution in these critical zones, the Eagles were able to turn scoring chances into tangible points, giving them the edge in a tightly contested 20–17 game. Balanced options in the red zone also minimized the risk of turnovers, which proved decisive in maintaining a lead late in the matchup.
The Kansas City offense faced more challenges in the red zone. Out of two opportunities inside scoring range, the Chiefs successfully converted only one, reflecting a combination of disciplined Philadelphia defense and execution errors. Their third-down conversion struggles compounded the issue, preventing sustained drives and limiting scoring momentum at crucial moments. These inefficiencies highlighted how situational football—particularly red zone management and third-down execution—can define outcomes in games with narrow scorelines.
Time of Possession and Game Control Metrics
Philadelphia maintained a time-of-possession advantage, controlling the ball for 32 minutes and 34 seconds compared to Kansas City’s 27 minutes and 26 seconds. This extended possession allowed the Eagles to dictate game tempo, keep their defense rested, and strategically run the clock in critical situations. Sustained drives through a combination of rushing and high-percentage passing limited Kansas City’s offensive opportunities, forcing the Chiefs to operate under higher pressure with fewer possessions.
For the Chiefs, shorter possession periods required faster decision-making, often under duress from Philadelphia’s disciplined pass rush and coverage schemes. This dynamic forced Mahomes into riskier throws and accelerated drive tempo, which contributed to the interception and reduced scoring chances. By effectively managing possession, the Eagles were able to leverage clock control as a strategic weapon, maintaining pressure while steadily converting opportunities into points.
Special Teams Performance Highlights
Philadelphia’s special teams had a notable influence on field position and scoring opportunities. A long-range field goal provided critical points and boosted team momentum. Additionally, their punt coverage and kickoff placements consistently pinned Kansas City deep in their own territory, forcing longer drives that increased the probability of mistakes. These contributions, while often understated, played a strategic role in supporting the Eagles’ balanced offensive and defensive game plan.
Kansas City’s special teams also executed effectively on several kicks, including routine field goals, but the hidden yardage and return yard advantages frequently favored Philadelphia. The subtle edge in field positioning allowed the Eagles to start drives in more advantageous spots, increasing scoring probability and limiting the Chiefs’ offensive flexibility. This contrast illustrates how special teams, often overlooked, can indirectly determine close game outcomes by enhancing overall team efficiency.
Key Player Matchups That Defined the Game
The quarterback duel between Jalen Hurts and Patrick Mahomes dominated the storyline of this matchup. Hurts’ dual-threat ability kept the Eagles’ offensive game plan unpredictable, mixing designed runs with efficient short and intermediate passes. This versatility forced Kansas City to defend both the perimeter and the middle of the field, preventing them from focusing solely on one aspect of Philadelphia’s attack. Hurts’ composure in critical third‑down situations allowed the Eagles to sustain long drives, control clock management, and dictate game tempo.
In contrast, Mahomes’ arm talent and mobility tested the Eagles’ defensive precision. While he made several big throws to challenge Philadelphia’s secondary, the disciplined gap control and pass-rush schemes minimized explosive plays. Meanwhile, the battles in the trenches were equally decisive: Philadelphia’s defensive front consistently disrupted Kansas City’s backfield timing, while the Chiefs’ pass rush forced hurried decisions from Hurts at critical moments. These pivotal matchups, both in the air and on the ground, shaped scoring opportunities, influenced tactical adjustments, and highlighted the strategic chess match between the teams.
Coaching Strategy and Tactical Adjustments
Eagles head coach Nick Sirianni implemented a strategy focused on ball control and a balanced rush-pass mix. By leveraging Philadelphia’s strengths in the running game while maintaining unpredictability in passing, Sirianni forced Kansas City to defend multiple facets of the offense simultaneously. His game plan emphasized clock management, sustaining drives, and avoiding turnovers, which proved critical in a tight 20–17 victory. Mid-game adjustments included rotating personnel and mixing up run schemes to counter the Chiefs’ defensive formations.
Chiefs coach Andy Reid aimed to exploit intermediate passing routes and Mahomes’ mobility, emphasizing tempo and spacing. However, persistent pressure from Philadelphia’s front seven disrupted timing and forced mid-drive recalibrations. Reid’s halftime adjustments, including varied route combinations and quick passes to running backs, partially mitigated the Eagles’ defensive advantages but could not fully overcome Philadelphia’s disciplined execution. This tactical interplay underscored how in-game coaching and timely adjustments influence both momentum and the final outcome.
Top Individual Performances of the Match
Saquon Barkley was a standout for Philadelphia, rushing for 88 yards and scoring a crucial touchdown that sustained momentum and helped control the clock. His vision between the tackles, ability to break arm tackles, and patience in finding gaps amplified the Eagles’ time-of-possession advantage, making him a focal point in key drives. Barkley’s performance demonstrated how individual contributions can shape overall team efficiency, particularly in situational football scenarios.
For the Chiefs, Patrick Mahomes delivered a dual-threat performance, combining 187 passing yards with a rushing touchdown. His ability to extend plays, escape pressure, and convert medium-range opportunities kept Kansas City competitive throughout the game. While limited in red zone scoring success, Mahomes’ leadership and adaptability highlighted his experience and athleticism. These performances showcased how both teams relied on star players to influence outcomes in high-stakes moments.
Statistical Comparison: Eagles vs Chiefs Team Metrics
From a team perspective, Kansas City outgained Philadelphia in total yardage, demonstrating the Chiefs’ ability to move the ball effectively between the 20s. However, inefficiencies in scoring opportunities, turnovers, and red zone execution ultimately tilted the game in favor of the Eagles. Philadelphia’s ability to control time of possession, sustain drives, and execute in high-leverage situations underscored the importance of efficiency over raw yardage.
The Eagles’ statistical advantages in time management and situational football explain why they secured the 20–17 win despite lower overall yardage. While the Chiefs demonstrated explosive potential, Philadelphia’s execution in critical areas such as red zone conversion, third-down efficiency, and ball control proved decisive. This contrast highlights a fundamental NFL principle: situational execution often outweighs total output, particularly in closely contested games.
What This Game Means for Both Teams Moving Forward
For the Philadelphia Eagles, the 20–17 victory demonstrates that disciplined execution and situational awareness are vital in close contests. Their ability to control the clock, sustain long drives, and convert in key red zone opportunities reinforces the effectiveness of their balanced offensive strategy. Going forward, this confidence in tempo management and efficiency could serve as a blueprint for future games, allowing them to dictate play, limit turnovers, and maintain defensive composure under pressure. The team can build on this success by continuing to emphasize situational football, which could be decisive in playoff scenarios.
For the Kansas City Chiefs, the game highlighted the gap between yardage production and scoring efficiency. Despite generating significant total yards, their red zone struggles and the single turnover impacted their ability to secure a win. Moving forward, refining red zone execution, protecting the ball, and sustaining drives will be critical for maximizing the team’s offensive potential. Strategic adjustments, such as improving situational play calling and leveraging Mahomes’ dual-threat ability, will be essential to regain dominance in tight contests against disciplined teams like the Eagles.
Conclusion
The Philadelphia Eagles vs Kansas City Chiefs matchup showcased how balance, discipline, and situational execution define winning NFL football. Philadelphia’s strategic use of time of possession, careful handling of critical plays, and effective red zone conversion proved decisive in their narrow 20–17 victory. This game emphasizes that efficiency in high-leverage moments can outweigh raw yardage and statistical dominance.
While the Chiefs displayed explosive yardage and playmaking ability, the Eagles’ sustained drives, ball control, and defensive discipline ultimately dictated the outcome. The matchup serves as a reminder that at the highest level of NFL competition, victories are determined not just by total production but by execution in crucial situations, tactical adaptability, and composure under pressure. Both teams now have valuable insights to carry forward into the remainder of the season.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Eagles vs Chiefs game discussed here?
Philadelphia Eagles won 20–17 on September 14, 2025.
How did Saquon Barkley perform?
He rushed for 88 yards and scored a touchdown.
What did Patrick Mahomes do in this game?
Mahomes threw for 187 yards with 1 touchdown and 1 interception, plus a rushing touchdown.
Which team controlled time of possession?
The Eagles held the ball longer with 32:34 vs Chiefs’ 27:26.
How did red zone performance affect the result?
The Eagles converted more efficiently inside the red zone, leading to sustained scoring.
Was woodwork or special teams influential?
Yes, key kicks and field position plays by special teams helped Philadelphia maintain control.
VISIT MORE: APEX MAGAZINE
